Discworld & Terry Pratchett Wiki - User contributions [en]

Talk:Webcomic and Graphic Novel Suggestions

2017-01-10T23:04:27Z

Heimar:

I'd put it in [[:Category:Reading suggestions|Reading suggestions]] with the rest. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 01:36, 15 November 2013 (GMT)

Integral or as a sub-category? I'll backtrack and reorganise later - bed beckons right now. And i'm still only up to page 240 - want to make the pleasure last and am rationing myself! [[User:AgProv|AgProv]] ([[User talk:AgProv|talk]]) 01:40, 15 November 2013 (GMT)
:It seems to be a page, like [[Reading suggestions]], why its own category? --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 01:55, 15 November 2013 (GMT)

Suggest these courses of action
A. Changed to a sub-category of reading suggestions (as previous users have proposed) and removed from main page
B. Content to be merged into the reading suggestions page and removed from main page
Reasons:
1. Lack of content, why have an own category when there is a "reading suggestion" category
2. Lack of relevance to Terry Pratchett and the Discworld (And therefore perhaps not the best to have on the main page)
3. Misappropriate number of page views (Being 10,849 times accessed this "page" has more views than E.G.: Lecturer in Recent Runes. page), more than it deserves which
in my opinion because of it's placement in the main page --[--[[User:Heimar|Heimar]] ([[User talk:Heimar|talk]]) 07:24:13, 10 January 2017 (GMT)
:Much as I said above: three years is getting to be a long time for AgProv to "backtrack and reorganise". I wouldn't merge it, though, ''Reading suggestions'' is long enough; I'd just link to this page. It's already categorised in Reading suggestions; a single page doesn't need a subcategory either. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 17:13, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

That would actually be the better solution, as it actually is a "reading suggestion" --[[User:Heimar|Heimar]] ([[User talk:Heimar|talk]]) 23:01:10, 10 January 2017 (GMT)

Talk:Webcomic and Graphic Novel Suggestions

2017-01-10T07:28:03Z

Heimar:

User:Heimar

2017-01-10T07:26:48Z

Heimar: Created page with "As I guess everyone else here very fond of the discworld novels Not planning on being very active but have enjoyed and used this page much in the past"

As I guess everyone else here very fond of the discworld novels
Not planning on being very active but have enjoyed and used this page much in the past

Talk:Webcomic and Graphic Novel Suggestions

2017-01-10T07:21:30Z

Heimar:

I'd put it in [[:Category:Reading suggestions|Reading suggestions]] with the rest. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 01:36, 15 November 2013 (GMT)

Integral or as a sub-category? I'll backtrack and reorganise later - bed beckons right now. And i'm still only up to page 240 - want to make the pleasure last and am rationing myself! [[User:AgProv|AgProv]] ([[User talk:AgProv|talk]]) 01:40, 15 November 2013 (GMT)
:It seems to be a page, like [[Reading suggestions]], why its own category? --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 01:55, 15 November 2013 (GMT)

I don't see the purpose of this page as a own category and I also do not agree that the page in it's current status should be on the "main page".
Therefore I suggest these courses of action
A. Changed to a sub-category of reading suggestions (as previous users have proposed) and removed from main page
B. Content to be merged into the reading suggestions page and removed from main page

Reasons:
1. Lack of content, why have an own category when there is a "reading suggestion" category
2. Lack of relevance to Terry Pratchett and the Discworld (And therefore perhaps not the best to have on the main page)
3. Misappropriate number of page views (Being 10,849 times accessed this "page" has more views than E.G.: Lecturer in Recent Runes. page), more than it deserves which
in my opinion because of it's placement in the main page

Talk:Webcomic and Graphic Novel Suggestions

2017-01-10T07:20:59Z

Heimar: /* Better as sub-category */ new section

I'd put it in [[:Category:Reading suggestions|Reading suggestions]] with the rest. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 01:36, 15 November 2013 (GMT)

Integral or as a sub-category? I'll backtrack and reorganise later - bed beckons right now. And i'm still only up to page 240 - want to make the pleasure last and am rationing myself! [[User:AgProv|AgProv]] ([[User talk:AgProv|talk]]) 01:40, 15 November 2013 (GMT)
:It seems to be a page, like [[Reading suggestions]], why its own category? --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 01:55, 15 November 2013 (GMT)

== Better as sub-category ==

I don't see the purpose of this page as a own category and I also do not agree that the page in it's current status should be on the "main page".
Therefore I suggest these courses of action
A. Changed to a sub-category of reading suggestions (as previous users have proposed) and removed from main page
B. Content to be merged into the reading suggestions page and removed from main page

Reasons:
1. Lack of content, why have an own category when there is a "reading suggestion" category
2. Lack of relevance to Terry Pratchett and the Discworld (And therefore perhaps not the best to have on the main page)
3. Misappropriate number of page views (Being 10,849 times accessed this "page" has more views than E.G.: Lecturer in Recent Runes. page), more than it deserves which
in my opinion because of it's placement in the main page