Talk:Book:Men at Arms - Revision history

Old Dickens: Joshing

2023-03-26T04:46:01Z

Joshing

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:46, 26 March 2023
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:If anything definitely doesn't seem to justify a link, I'll remove it- I already removed a lot of the links to kings and architects (who we know nothing about), and to the book you mentioned and some other concepts. [[User:TC01\|TC01]] 19:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC)		:If anything definitely doesn't seem to justify a link, I'll remove it- I already removed a lot of the links to kings and architects (who we know nothing about), and to the book you mentioned and some other concepts. [[User:TC01\|TC01]] 19:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

			The File:Cover Men At Arms.jpg wants a [[File talk:Cover Men At Arms.jpg\|discussion of its own.]] If that's Fred on our right, who's that just behind and attached to Nobby? --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 04:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Old Dickens: Old Dickens moved page Book talk:Men at Arms to Talk:Book:Men at Arms without leaving a redirect

2012-12-26T18:24:10Z

Old Dickens moved page Book talk:Men at Arms to Talk:Book:Men at Arms without leaving a redirect

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:24, 26 December 2012
(No difference)

Old Dickens: 4 revisions: getting the hang of it

2012-12-26T17:49:19Z

4 revisions: getting the hang of it

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:49, 26 December 2012
(No difference)

TC01 at 19:20, 7 November 2009

2009-11-07T19:20:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:20, 7 November 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I guess you have to correct the spelling for a link or title. No one is likely to search under the Morporkian (mis)spelling. Again, I wonder if there's anything to be said about it to justify the link at all. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 22:40, 6 November 2009 (UTC)		I guess you have to correct the spelling for a link or title. No one is likely to search under the Morporkian (mis)spelling. Again, I wonder if there's anything to be said about it to justify the link at all. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 22:40, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

			:If anything definitely doesn't seem to justify a link, I'll remove it- I already removed a lot of the links to kings and architects (who we know nothing about), and to the book you mentioned and some other concepts. [[User:TC01\|TC01]] 19:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Old Dickens at 22:40, 6 November 2009

2009-11-06T22:40:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:40, 6 November 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:And yeah, a lot of the links are likely to stay red for a while (or forever), but I'm making them links so as to make it easier to create the article linked to (if one would be created). And if said character/location/thing doesn't deserve an article, then the link can be removed in the future... anyway, a lot of other books have similar red links- {{COM}} used to have a lot, but I've created a lot of articles where there is appropriate information. [[User:TC01\|TC01]] 21:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC)		:And yeah, a lot of the links are likely to stay red for a while (or forever), but I'm making them links so as to make it easier to create the article linked to (if one would be created). And if said character/location/thing doesn't deserve an article, then the link can be removed in the future... anyway, a lot of other books have similar red links- {{COM}} used to have a lot, but I've created a lot of articles where there is appropriate information. [[User:TC01\|TC01]] 21:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

			I guess you have to correct the spelling for a link or title. No one is likely to search under the Morporkian (mis)spelling. Again, I wonder if there's anything to be said about it to justify the link at all. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 22:40, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

TC01 at 21:51, 6 November 2009

2009-11-06T21:51:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:51, 6 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The recent edits create a lot of red links that are likely to stay red, and while I don't remember the reference, I'll bet Thighbiter's book title contains a "long s" (ſ), not an "f". --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 21:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)		The recent edits create a lot of red links that are likely to stay red, and while I don't remember the reference, I'll bet Thighbiter's book title contains a "long s" (ſ), not an "f". --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 21:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

			:I think it is supposed to be a "long s". Should it just be an "s", then?

			:And yeah, a lot of the links are likely to stay red for a while (or forever), but I'm making them links so as to make it easier to create the article linked to (if one would be created). And if said character/location/thing doesn't deserve an article, then the link can be removed in the future... anyway, a lot of other books have similar red links- {{COM}} used to have a lot, but I've created a lot of articles where there is appropriate information. [[User:TC01\|TC01]] 21:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Old Dickens: suggestions

2009-11-06T21:07:14Z

suggestions

New page

The recent edits create a lot of red links that are likely to stay red, and while I don't remember the reference, I'll bet Thighbiter's book title contains a "long s" (ſ), not an "f". --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] 21:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)