Talk:Book:Thief of Time/Annotations - Revision history

Old Dickens at 04:22, 11 December 2022

2022-12-11T04:22:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:22, 11 December 2022
Line 16:		Line 16:

	== Clockson / Cornelius? Not convinced. ==		== Clockson / Cornelius? Not convinced. ==
	So, in the spirit of winnowing down annotations that might be a stretch... I don't see the Jeremy Clockson / Jerry Cornelius connection. I mean, I wouldn't complain about having this discussion placed on the talk page, in case someone can flesh this out more thoroughly. But as it stands, this seems quite a reach.		So, in the spirit of winnowing down annotations that might be a stretch... I don't see the Jeremy Clockson / Jerry Cornelius connection. I mean, I wouldn't complain about having this discussion placed on the talk page, in case someone can flesh this out more thoroughly. But as it stands, this seems quite a reach.

	Any objections if I were to move it here? I can't figure out who wrote that part originally, because it seems to date from the time before the Wave... [[User:Moishe Rosenbaum\|Moishe Rosenbaum]] ([[User talk:Moishe Rosenbaum\|talk]]) 04:13, 11 December 2022 (UTC)		Any objections if I were to move it here? I can't figure out who wrote that part originally, because it seems to date from the time before the Wave... [[User:Moishe Rosenbaum\|Moishe Rosenbaum]] ([[User talk:Moishe Rosenbaum\|talk]]) 04:13, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
			:It seems to me to hang together as well as the average annotation, and it's on the proper page. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 04:22, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Moishe Rosenbaum: Another annotation I'd like to move...

2022-12-11T04:13:48Z

Another annotation I'd like to move...

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:13, 11 December 2022
Line 14:		Line 14:
	Well, the APF is published already, right here in [http://www.lspace.org LSpace], so there's no point in re-hashing it in the wiki. The idea of annotation pages was to collect material for Leo to pick through to go ''into'' the APF. I think [[User:Sanity\|Sanity]] posted a note somewhere not to copy from the APF, but I forget where, now. I believe Leo is still working on a new APF; it's the timeline I wonder about. It's about two years since we held off on constructing a timeline because Orin Thomas and Esmi were updating the original, but there's still nothing. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 22:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC)<br>		Well, the APF is published already, right here in [http://www.lspace.org LSpace], so there's no point in re-hashing it in the wiki. The idea of annotation pages was to collect material for Leo to pick through to go ''into'' the APF. I think [[User:Sanity\|Sanity]] posted a note somewhere not to copy from the APF, but I forget where, now. I believe Leo is still working on a new APF; it's the timeline I wonder about. It's about two years since we held off on constructing a timeline because Orin Thomas and Esmi were updating the original, but there's still nothing. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 22:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC)<br>
	Oh yes, see [[Annotations]]. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 23:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC)		Oh yes, see [[Annotations]]. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 23:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

			== Clockson / Cornelius? Not convinced. ==
			So, in the spirit of winnowing down annotations that might be a stretch... I don't see the Jeremy Clockson / Jerry Cornelius connection. I mean, I wouldn't complain about having this discussion placed on the talk page, in case someone can flesh this out more thoroughly. But as it stands, this seems quite a reach.

			Any objections if I were to move it here? I can't figure out who wrote that part originally, because it seems to date from the time before the Wave... [[User:Moishe Rosenbaum\|Moishe Rosenbaum]] ([[User talk:Moishe Rosenbaum\|talk]]) 04:13, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Old Dickens: Old Dickens moved page Book talk:Thief of Time/Annotations to Talk:Book:Thief of Time/Annotations without leaving a redirect

2012-12-26T19:08:25Z

Old Dickens moved page Book talk:Thief of Time/Annotations to Talk:Book:Thief of Time/Annotations without leaving a redirect

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:08, 26 December 2012
(No difference)

Old Dickens: 7 revisions: getting the hang of it

2012-12-26T17:49:48Z

7 revisions: getting the hang of it

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:49, 26 December 2012
(No difference)

Old Dickens at 23:27, 11 May 2009

2009-05-11T23:27:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:27, 11 May 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:Feel free to shoot this idea down, but are there any laws, rules or moral objections to copying items from the annotated pratchett file? Thanks for your time.--[[User:Beligaronia\|Beligaronia]] 21:15, 11 May 2009 (UTC)		:Feel free to shoot this idea down, but are there any laws, rules or moral objections to copying items from the annotated pratchett file? Thanks for your time.--[[User:Beligaronia\|Beligaronia]] 21:15, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

	Well, the APF is published already, right here in [http://www.lspace.org LSpace], so there's no point in re-hashing it in the wiki. The idea of annotation pages was to collect material for Leo to pick through to go ''into'' the APF. I think [[User:Sanity\|Sanity]] posted a note somewhere not to copy from the APF, but I forget where, now. I believe Leo is still working on a new APF; it's the timeline I wonder about. It's about two years since we held off on constructing a timeline because Orin Thomas and Esmi were updating the original, but there's still nothing. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 22:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC)		Well, the APF is published already, right here in [http://www.lspace.org LSpace], so there's no point in re-hashing it in the wiki. The idea of annotation pages was to collect material for Leo to pick through to go ''into'' the APF. I think [[User:Sanity\|Sanity]] posted a note somewhere not to copy from the APF, but I forget where, now. I believe Leo is still working on a new APF; it's the timeline I wonder about. It's about two years since we held off on constructing a timeline because Orin Thomas and Esmi were updating the original, but there's still nothing. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 22:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC)<br>
			Oh yes, see [[Annotations]]. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 23:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Old Dickens at 22:14, 11 May 2009

2009-05-11T22:14:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 11 May 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:Feel free to shoot this idea down, but are there any laws, rules or moral objections to copying items from the annotated pratchett file? Thanks for your time.--[[User:Beligaronia\|Beligaronia]] 21:15, 11 May 2009 (UTC)		:Feel free to shoot this idea down, but are there any laws, rules or moral objections to copying items from the annotated pratchett file? Thanks for your time.--[[User:Beligaronia\|Beligaronia]] 21:15, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

	Well, the APF is published already, right here in [www.lspace.org\|LSpace], so there's no point in re-hashing it in the wiki. The idea of annotation pages was to collect material for Leo to pick through to go ''into'' the APF. I think [[User:Sanity\|Sanity]] posted a note somewhere not to copy from the APF, but I forget where, now. I believe Leo is still working on a new APF; it's the timeline I wonder about. It's about two years since we held off on constructing a timeline because Orin Thomas and Esmi were updating the original, but there's still nothing. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 22:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC)		Well, the APF is published already, right here in [http://www.lspace.org LSpace], so there's no point in re-hashing it in the wiki. The idea of annotation pages was to collect material for Leo to pick through to go ''into'' the APF. I think [[User:Sanity\|Sanity]] posted a note somewhere not to copy from the APF, but I forget where, now. I believe Leo is still working on a new APF; it's the timeline I wonder about. It's about two years since we held off on constructing a timeline because Orin Thomas and Esmi were updating the original, but there's still nothing. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 22:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Old Dickens at 22:12, 11 May 2009

2009-05-11T22:12:22Z

New page

"(It is also very clearly a reference to motoring journalist Jeremy Clarkson, and shame on you for not noticing.)"

Ah-ha, but I indeed have... see [[Jeremy Clockson|here]] for the discussion. I was mystified as to the connection between extravert insensitive boy racer Clarkson and the extremely introvert and perhaps even autistic Jeremy Clockson - two complete opposites sharing a name? --[[User:AgProv|AgProv]] 11:49, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

(1-These people are not here to look around and find something that might contradict their prejudices.<br>
2- When your postulate is iffy, say it's "very clearly" so; every politician knows this.<br>
3- Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.) --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] 16:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: page numbers. The form was to list them by page numbers of the the original HC edition. This is a bit difficult for many who don't have an original Doubleday or Gollancz, so they're often omitted. My recurring problem with annotations is that no one follows any rules about placement and there is no constraint on the content.
--[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] 12:31, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

:Feel free to shoot this idea down, but are there any laws, rules or moral objections to copying items from the annotated pratchett file? Thanks for your time.--[[User:Beligaronia|Beligaronia]] 21:15, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Well, the APF is published already, right here in [www.lspace.org|LSpace], so there's no point in re-hashing it in the wiki. The idea of annotation pages was to collect material for Leo to pick through to go ''into'' the APF. I think [[User:Sanity|Sanity]] posted a note somewhere not to copy from the APF, but I forget where, now. I believe Leo is still working on a new APF; it's the timeline I wonder about. It's about two years since we held off on constructing a timeline because Orin Thomas and Esmi were updating the original, but there's still nothing. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] 22:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Old Dickens: page #

2009-05-11T12:31:52Z

page #

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:31, 11 May 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	2- When your postulate is iffy, say it's "very clearly" so; every politician knows this.<br>		2- When your postulate is iffy, say it's "very clearly" so; every politician knows this.<br>
	3- Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.) --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 16:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC)		3- Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.) --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 16:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

			Re: page numbers. The form was to list them by page numbers of the the original HC edition. This is a bit difficult for many who don't have an original Doubleday or Gollancz, so they're often omitted. My recurring problem with annotations is that no one follows any rules about placement and there is no constraint on the content.
			--[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 12:31, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Old Dickens at 16:12, 10 March 2009

2009-03-10T16:12:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:12, 10 March 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Ah-ha, but I indeed have... see [[Jeremy Clockson\|here]] for the discussion. I was mystified as to the connection between extravert insensitive boy racer Clarkson and the extremely introvert and perhaps even autistic Jeremy Clockson - two complete opposites sharing a name? --[[User:AgProv\|AgProv]] 11:49, 10 March 2009 (UTC)		Ah-ha, but I indeed have... see [[Jeremy Clockson\|here]] for the discussion. I was mystified as to the connection between extravert insensitive boy racer Clarkson and the extremely introvert and perhaps even autistic Jeremy Clockson - two complete opposites sharing a name? --[[User:AgProv\|AgProv]] 11:49, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

			(1-These people are not here to look around and find something that might contradict their prejudices.<br>
			2- When your postulate is iffy, say it's "very clearly" so; every politician knows this.<br>
			3- Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.) --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 16:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

AgProv: New page: "(It is also very clearly a reference to motoring journalist Jeremy Clarkson, and shame on you for not noticing.)" Ah-ha, but I indeed have... see here for the discus...

2009-03-10T11:49:12Z

New page: "(It is also very clearly a reference to motoring journalist Jeremy Clarkson, and shame on you for not noticing.)" Ah-ha, but I indeed have... see here for the discus...

New page