Talk:Cut-Me-Own-Throat Dibbler - Revision history

Irreverend: /* Accuracy? */

2020-06-18T22:43:34Z

Accuracy?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:43, 18 June 2020
Line 26:		Line 26:
	“I’ve never seen someone eat three of Throat Dibbler’s sausages inna bun and look so upright,” said the Dean.		“I’ve never seen someone eat three of Throat Dibbler’s sausages inna bun and look so upright,” said the Dean.

	Being upright as unusual suggests that they may usually/often make you ill. ~~----~~		Being upright as unusual suggests that they may usually/often make you ill. [[User:Irreverend\|Irreverend]] ([[User talk:Irreverend\|talk]]) 22:43, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Irreverend: /* Accuracy? */

2020-06-18T22:42:30Z

Accuracy?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:42, 18 June 2020
Line 26:		Line 26:
	“I’ve never seen someone eat three of Throat Dibbler’s sausages inna bun and look so upright,” said the Dean.		“I’ve never seen someone eat three of Throat Dibbler’s sausages inna bun and look so upright,” said the Dean.

	Being upright as unusual suggests that they may usually/often make you ill.		Being upright as unusual suggests that they may usually/often make you ill. ----

Irreverend: /* Accuracy? */

2020-06-18T22:40:18Z

Accuracy?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:40, 18 June 2020
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:*And then you bit into them, and learned once again that Cut-me-own-Throat Dibbler could find a use for bits of an animal that the animal didn't know it had got.		:*And then you bit into them, and learned once again that Cut-me-own-Throat Dibbler could find a use for bits of an animal that the animal didn't know it had got.
	:et al. No reviews of more than one star found. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 01:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)		:et al. No reviews of more than one star found. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 01:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

			I'm really unsure how to properly edit this, but there certainly are some indications that Dibblers sausages inna bun may make you ill, one example from Interesting Times:

			“I’ve never seen anyone eat three of Throat Dibbler’s sausages inna bun and look so happy,” said the Senior Wrangler.
			“I’ve never seen someone eat three of Throat Dibbler’s sausages inna bun and look so upright,” said the Dean.

			Being upright as unusual suggests that they may usually/often make you ill.

Old Dickens at 01:00, 22 July 2018

2018-07-22T01:00:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:00, 22 July 2018
Line 16:		Line 16:

	Might also be worth chasing up to see whether a link can be found to Fam(m)ine in Good Omens, whose "food" is devoid of any nutritional value whatsoever. --[[User:Lias Bluestone\|Lias Bluestone]] ([[User talk:Lias Bluestone\|talk]]) 13:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)		Might also be worth chasing up to see whether a link can be found to Fam(m)ine in Good Omens, whose "food" is devoid of any nutritional value whatsoever. --[[User:Lias Bluestone\|Lias Bluestone]] ([[User talk:Lias Bluestone\|talk]]) 13:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
			:Sample reviews of Dibbler sausages:<BR>
			:*...one of Throat's sausages, cast aside by a hungry reveller who had decided he was never going to be that hungry.
			:*And then you bit into them, and learned once again that Cut-me-own-Throat Dibbler could find a use for bits of an animal that the animal didn't know it had got.
			:et al. No reviews of more than one star found. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 01:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Lias Bluestone: /* Accuracy? */ new section

2018-07-21T13:28:19Z

Accuracy?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:28, 21 July 2018
Line 10:		Line 10:

	I love the image, but do we have an excuse to use it? We're traditionally very afraid of lawyers (Feeglish, almost.) --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 02:13, 5 January 2008 (CET)		I love the image, but do we have an excuse to use it? We're traditionally very afraid of lawyers (Feeglish, almost.) --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 02:13, 5 January 2008 (CET)

			== Accuracy? ==

			As far as I am aware, nowhere in the canon does it suggest that CMOT's sausage inna bun tastes awful, or that people have actually been made ill from eating them. From my memory (buried somewhere in one of the Watch books, G!G! probably), it is explicitly pointed out that they ''don't actually seem to taste of anything''. It can be argued that this is more amusing than the obvious and hackneyed "taste awful and they make you ill".

			Might also be worth chasing up to see whether a link can be found to Fam(m)ine in Good Omens, whose "food" is devoid of any nutritional value whatsoever. --[[User:Lias Bluestone\|Lias Bluestone]] ([[User talk:Lias Bluestone\|talk]]) 13:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Osiris: 1 revision: Talk Namespace

2012-12-26T03:15:55Z

1 revision: Talk Namespace

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:15, 26 December 2012
(No difference)

Old Dickens at 01:13, 5 January 2008

2008-01-05T01:13:56Z

New page

== Which name should we use? ==

Should we write it as CMOT Dibbler, C.M.O.T. Dibbller or Cut-Me-Own-Throat Dibbler? I personally have no oppinion other that that the whole name is quite long. [[User:Jeltz|Jeltz]] 21:11, 29 November 2005 (CET)
: I'd say Cut-Me-Own-Throat Dibbler (with redirects from CMOT & C.M.O.T. of course). I feel we should use the characters "full name" as the char's main page. Then again, it raises the questions of Angua (Delphine ?) and vampires whith very long names ... --[[User:Silaor|Silaor]] 21:21, 29 November 2005 (CET)
::Yeah using the whole name makes sense in this case but not in some others. What should we call [[Nobby]] for example? I'm starting to think that using Cut-Me-Own-Throat is best even if it is a bit long. This is a wiki and not paper :) [[User:Jeltz|Jeltz]] 21:33, 29 November 2005 (CET)
:::As you may have noticed I chose the full names as page names in the German wiki with redirects from all the short names. Even if it means an article name like ''Cecil Wormsborough St John Nobbs''. Everybody who enters ''Nobby'' will still find their way. In case of Sally I went for ''Sally von Humpeding'' because the '''full''' name wasn't there. It just seems ''right'' because this whole thing is like a lexicon and ''full'' seems to be appropriate. --[[User:Death|Death]] 22:12, 29 November 2005 (CET)
::::I was concerned about typing all that long name while writing articles. I think the page with abbreviated name can be kept as a redirect so the abbreviation can be used while writing the articles. -- Vsl

Well done, Old Dickens! I saw this earlier but really couldn't face doing it - --[[User:Knmatt|Knmatt]] 22:35, 4 January 2008 (CET)

I love the image, but do we have an excuse to use it? We're traditionally very afraid of lawyers (Feeglish, almost.) --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] 02:13, 5 January 2008 (CET)