Talk:Short Story:Medical Notes - Revision history

Guybrush: Guybrush moved page Talk:Medical Notes to Talk:Short Story:Medical Notes: It's intended to be listed as a short story but doesn't use the name space.

2022-03-03T22:57:17Z

Guybrush moved page Talk:Medical Notes to Talk:Short Story:Medical Notes: It's intended to be listed as a short story but doesn't use the name space.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:57, 3 March 2022
(No difference)

Old Dickens at 05:01, 2 March 2022

2022-03-02T05:01:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:01, 2 March 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Maybe we could call them supplements? --[[User:Zdm\|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm\|talk]]) 03:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)		::Maybe we could call them supplements? --[[User:Zdm\|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm\|talk]]) 03:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
	:::Ah I see what you mean, in that case how about renaming all of these to Short Fiction, disregard the latter part of what I said, we could try something like this Short Fiction:Troll Bridge along with Short Fiction:Thud-A Historical Perspective, that way it categorizes all of the short stories along with the other works that best fit into this one category and it eliminates the miscellaneous or one entry categories (e.g. Poems, Songs) by grouping them all together, or at least it will seriously reduce them. --[[User:Jagra\|Jagra]] ([[User talk:Jagra\|talk]]) 20:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)		:::Ah I see what you mean, in that case how about renaming all of these to Short Fiction, disregard the latter part of what I said, we could try something like this Short Fiction:Troll Bridge along with Short Fiction:Thud-A Historical Perspective, that way it categorizes all of the short stories along with the other works that best fit into this one category and it eliminates the miscellaneous or one entry categories (e.g. Poems, Songs) by grouping them all together, or at least it will seriously reduce them. --[[User:Jagra\|Jagra]] ([[User talk:Jagra\|talk]]) 20:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
	:I'm drawn back to the "Background" category, but it would entail updating other pages. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 04:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)		:I'm drawn back to the "Background" category, but it would entail updating other pages. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 05:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Old Dickens at 04:59, 2 March 2022

2022-03-02T04:59:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:59, 2 March 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Maybe we could call them supplements? --[[User:Zdm\|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm\|talk]]) 03:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)		::Maybe we could call them supplements? --[[User:Zdm\|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm\|talk]]) 03:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
	:::Ah I see what you mean, in that case how about renaming all of these to Short Fiction, disregard the latter part of what I said, we could try something like this Short Fiction:Troll Bridge along with Short Fiction:Thud-A Historical Perspective, that way it categorizes all of the short stories along with the other works that best fit into this one category and it eliminates the miscellaneous or one entry categories (e.g. Poems, Songs) by grouping them all together, or at least it will seriously reduce them. --[[User:Jagra\|Jagra]] ([[User talk:Jagra\|talk]]) 20:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)		:::Ah I see what you mean, in that case how about renaming all of these to Short Fiction, disregard the latter part of what I said, we could try something like this Short Fiction:Troll Bridge along with Short Fiction:Thud-A Historical Perspective, that way it categorizes all of the short stories along with the other works that best fit into this one category and it eliminates the miscellaneous or one entry categories (e.g. Poems, Songs) by grouping them all together, or at least it will seriously reduce them. --[[User:Jagra\|Jagra]] ([[User talk:Jagra\|talk]]) 20:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
			:I'm drawn back to the "Background" category, but it would entail updating other pages. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 04:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Jagra at 20:32, 23 September 2015

2015-09-23T20:32:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:32, 23 September 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:We discussed this problem [[Discworld & Pratchett Wiki:Mended Drum#Namespaces\|before]], but what's the value of a "miscellaneous" or such category if it means "uncategorised"? Likewise, categories of one don't make much sense: might as well leave the oddballs uncategorised or stick them somewhere close, like this. (There might be a category like "Background" for things like this, Diaries,''Thud-A Historical Perspective'' and such.) --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 19:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)		:We discussed this problem [[Discworld & Pratchett Wiki:Mended Drum#Namespaces\|before]], but what's the value of a "miscellaneous" or such category if it means "uncategorised"? Likewise, categories of one don't make much sense: might as well leave the oddballs uncategorised or stick them somewhere close, like this. (There might be a category like "Background" for things like this, Diaries,''Thud-A Historical Perspective'' and such.) --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 19:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
	::Maybe we could call them supplements? --[[User:Zdm\|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm\|talk]]) 03:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)		::Maybe we could call them supplements? --[[User:Zdm\|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm\|talk]]) 03:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
			:::Ah I see what you mean, in that case how about renaming all of these to Short Fiction, disregard the latter part of what I said, we could try something like this Short Fiction:Troll Bridge along with Short Fiction:Thud-A Historical Perspective, that way it categorizes all of the short stories along with the other works that best fit into this one category and it eliminates the miscellaneous or one entry categories (e.g. Poems, Songs) by grouping them all together, or at least it will seriously reduce them. --[[User:Jagra\|Jagra]] ([[User talk:Jagra\|talk]]) 20:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Zdm at 03:54, 23 September 2015

2015-09-23T03:54:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:54, 23 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I can see that [[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] isn't happy about this being under short stories, as well as this there are several other works that don't fit this category but are included anyway, such as [[We Can Rule You Wholesale\|songs]], poems and a speech, as this is the most suitable category for them to fall under. A possible solution would be to rename Short Stories to Short Fiction. This category would be more inclusive towards various types of shorter fiction already included allowing for something like {{TB}} to still be classified as a Short Story and [[An Ode to Multiple Universes]] to be classed as a Poem but for both to appear in the same category. [[User:Jagra\|Jagra]] ([[User talk:Jagra\|talk]]) 18:40, 22 September, UTC.		I can see that [[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] isn't happy about this being under short stories, as well as this there are several other works that don't fit this category but are included anyway, such as [[We Can Rule You Wholesale\|songs]], poems and a speech, as this is the most suitable category for them to fall under. A possible solution would be to rename Short Stories to Short Fiction. This category would be more inclusive towards various types of shorter fiction already included allowing for something like {{TB}} to still be classified as a Short Story and [[An Ode to Multiple Universes]] to be classed as a Poem but for both to appear in the same category. [[User:Jagra\|Jagra]] ([[User talk:Jagra\|talk]]) 18:40, 22 September, UTC.
	:We discussed this problem [[Discworld & Pratchett Wiki:Mended Drum#Namespaces\|before]], but what's the value of a "miscellaneous" or such category if it means "uncategorised"? Likewise, categories of one don't make much sense: might as well leave the oddballs uncategorised or stick them somewhere close, like this. (There might be a category like "Background" for things like this, Diaries,''Thud-A Historical Perspective'' and such.) --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 19:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)		:We discussed this problem [[Discworld & Pratchett Wiki:Mended Drum#Namespaces\|before]], but what's the value of a "miscellaneous" or such category if it means "uncategorised"? Likewise, categories of one don't make much sense: might as well leave the oddballs uncategorised or stick them somewhere close, like this. (There might be a category like "Background" for things like this, Diaries,''Thud-A Historical Perspective'' and such.) --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 19:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
			::Maybe we could call them supplements? --[[User:Zdm\|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm\|talk]]) 03:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Old Dickens at 19:35, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T19:35:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:35, 22 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I can see that [[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] isn't happy about this being under short stories, as well as this there are several other works that don't fit this category but are included anyway, such as [[We Can Rule You Wholesale\|songs]], poems and a speech, as this is the most suitable category for them to fall under. A possible solution would be to rename Short Stories to Short Fiction. This category would be more inclusive towards various types of shorter fiction already included allowing for something like {{TB}} to still be classified as a Short Story and [[An Ode to Multiple Universes]] to be classed as a Poem but for both to appear in the same category. [[User:Jagra\|Jagra]] ([[User talk:Jagra\|talk]]) 18:40, 22 September, UTC.		I can see that [[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] isn't happy about this being under short stories, as well as this there are several other works that don't fit this category but are included anyway, such as [[We Can Rule You Wholesale\|songs]], poems and a speech, as this is the most suitable category for them to fall under. A possible solution would be to rename Short Stories to Short Fiction. This category would be more inclusive towards various types of shorter fiction already included allowing for something like {{TB}} to still be classified as a Short Story and [[An Ode to Multiple Universes]] to be classed as a Poem but for both to appear in the same category. [[User:Jagra\|Jagra]] ([[User talk:Jagra\|talk]]) 18:40, 22 September, UTC.
			:We discussed this problem [[Discworld & Pratchett Wiki:Mended Drum#Namespaces\|before]], but what's the value of a "miscellaneous" or such category if it means "uncategorised"? Likewise, categories of one don't make much sense: might as well leave the oddballs uncategorised or stick them somewhere close, like this. (There might be a category like "Background" for things like this, Diaries,''Thud-A Historical Perspective'' and such.) --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 19:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Jagra: Created page with "I can see that Old Dickens isn't happy about this being under short stories, as well as this there are several other works that don't fit this category bu..."

2015-09-22T18:46:02Z

Created page with "I can see that Old Dickens isn't happy about this being under short stories, as well as this there are several other works that don't fit this category bu..."

New page

I can see that [[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] isn't happy about this being under short stories, as well as this there are several other works that don't fit this category but are included anyway, such as [[We Can Rule You Wholesale|songs]], poems and a speech, as this is the most suitable category for them to fall under. A possible solution would be to rename Short Stories to Short Fiction. This category would be more inclusive towards various types of shorter fiction already included allowing for something like {{TB}} to still be classified as a Short Story and [[An Ode to Multiple Universes]] to be classed as a Poem but for both to appear in the same category. [[User:Jagra|Jagra]] ([[User talk:Jagra|talk]]) 18:40, 22 September, UTC.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:01, 2 March 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Maybe we could call them supplements? --[[User:Zdm\|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm\|talk]]) 03:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)		::Maybe we could call them supplements? --[[User:Zdm\|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm\|talk]]) 03:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
	:::Ah I see what you mean, in that case how about renaming all of these to Short Fiction, disregard the latter part of what I said, we could try something like this Short Fiction:Troll Bridge along with Short Fiction:Thud-A Historical Perspective, that way it categorizes all of the short stories along with the other works that best fit into this one category and it eliminates the miscellaneous or one entry categories (e.g. Poems, Songs) by grouping them all together, or at least it will seriously reduce them. --[[User:Jagra\|Jagra]] ([[User talk:Jagra\|talk]]) 20:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)		:::Ah I see what you mean, in that case how about renaming all of these to Short Fiction, disregard the latter part of what I said, we could try something like this Short Fiction:Troll Bridge along with Short Fiction:Thud-A Historical Perspective, that way it categorizes all of the short stories along with the other works that best fit into this one category and it eliminates the miscellaneous or one entry categories (e.g. Poems, Songs) by grouping them all together, or at least it will seriously reduce them. --[[User:Jagra\|Jagra]] ([[User talk:Jagra\|talk]]) 20:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
	:I'm drawn back to the "Background" category, but it would entail updating other pages. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 04:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)		:I'm drawn back to the "Background" category, but it would entail updating other pages. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 05:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:59, 2 March 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Maybe we could call them supplements? --[[User:Zdm\|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm\|talk]]) 03:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)		::Maybe we could call them supplements? --[[User:Zdm\|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm\|talk]]) 03:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
	:::Ah I see what you mean, in that case how about renaming all of these to Short Fiction, disregard the latter part of what I said, we could try something like this Short Fiction:Troll Bridge along with Short Fiction:Thud-A Historical Perspective, that way it categorizes all of the short stories along with the other works that best fit into this one category and it eliminates the miscellaneous or one entry categories (e.g. Poems, Songs) by grouping them all together, or at least it will seriously reduce them. --[[User:Jagra\|Jagra]] ([[User talk:Jagra\|talk]]) 20:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)		:::Ah I see what you mean, in that case how about renaming all of these to Short Fiction, disregard the latter part of what I said, we could try something like this Short Fiction:Troll Bridge along with Short Fiction:Thud-A Historical Perspective, that way it categorizes all of the short stories along with the other works that best fit into this one category and it eliminates the miscellaneous or one entry categories (e.g. Poems, Songs) by grouping them all together, or at least it will seriously reduce them. --[[User:Jagra\|Jagra]] ([[User talk:Jagra\|talk]]) 20:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
			:I'm drawn back to the "Background" category, but it would entail updating other pages. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 04:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:32, 23 September 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:We discussed this problem [[Discworld & Pratchett Wiki:Mended Drum#Namespaces\|before]], but what's the value of a "miscellaneous" or such category if it means "uncategorised"? Likewise, categories of one don't make much sense: might as well leave the oddballs uncategorised or stick them somewhere close, like this. (There might be a category like "Background" for things like this, Diaries,''Thud-A Historical Perspective'' and such.) --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 19:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)		:We discussed this problem [[Discworld & Pratchett Wiki:Mended Drum#Namespaces\|before]], but what's the value of a "miscellaneous" or such category if it means "uncategorised"? Likewise, categories of one don't make much sense: might as well leave the oddballs uncategorised or stick them somewhere close, like this. (There might be a category like "Background" for things like this, Diaries,''Thud-A Historical Perspective'' and such.) --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 19:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
	::Maybe we could call them supplements? --[[User:Zdm\|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm\|talk]]) 03:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)		::Maybe we could call them supplements? --[[User:Zdm\|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm\|talk]]) 03:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
			:::Ah I see what you mean, in that case how about renaming all of these to Short Fiction, disregard the latter part of what I said, we could try something like this Short Fiction:Troll Bridge along with Short Fiction:Thud-A Historical Perspective, that way it categorizes all of the short stories along with the other works that best fit into this one category and it eliminates the miscellaneous or one entry categories (e.g. Poems, Songs) by grouping them all together, or at least it will seriously reduce them. --[[User:Jagra\|Jagra]] ([[User talk:Jagra\|talk]]) 20:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)