Talk:Vanglemesh - Revision history

Old Dickens at 16:39, 2 April 2016

2016-04-02T16:39:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:39, 2 April 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Therefore:		Therefore:
	*[[~~Vangelmesh~~]] the country;		*[[Vanglemesh]] the country;
	*[[Vanglemesht]] the language		*[[Vanglemesht]] the language

Line 15:		Line 15:
	Having just added the Annotation about name comparisons to Bangladesh, I decided it best to hold back from adding too many assumptions to the entry.		Having just added the Annotation about name comparisons to Bangladesh, I decided it best to hold back from adding too many assumptions to the entry.

	What I was thinking of saying though, was from this comparison we might be able to start guessing about the culture and politics of the region. For example, Bangladesh's foreign policy is based on the principle of "friendship towards all and malice towards none". Given Vanglemesh's location - quit close to once invasive Omnia, Istanzia with it's recently transgressing troops (of where we do not know) and various other relatively nearby powers (who, if history teaches us anything, are quite likely to have had little conflicts between each other) a policy like Bangladesh's might prove useful in creating relative benevolent neutrality (if there is such a thing and it's not too paradoxical) and help them avoid any such conflicts.		What I was thinking of saying though, was from this comparison we might be able to start guessing about the culture and politics of the region. For example, Bangladesh's foreign policy is based on the principle of "friendship towards all and malice towards none". Given Vanglemesh's location - quit close to once invasive Omnia, Istanzia with it's recently transgressing troops (of where we do not know) and various other relatively nearby powers (who, if history teaches us anything, are quite likely to have had little conflicts between each other) a policy like Bangladesh's might prove useful in creating relative benevolent neutrality (if there is such a thing and it's not too paradoxical) and help them avoid any such conflicts. --[[User:GallifreyanWitch\|Verity]] ([[User talk:GallifreyanWitch\|talk]]) 15:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
			:And, the ''Atlas'' mentions its extremely hot peppers; see {{wp\|Bhut jolokia\|Bhut jolokia}}. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 16:39, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
	--[[User:GallifreyanWitch\|Verity]] ([[User talk:GallifreyanWitch\|talk]]) 15:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Old Dickens: Old Dickens moved page Talk:Vangelmesh to Talk:Vanglemesh: canonical spelling

2016-04-02T16:30:59Z

Old Dickens moved page Talk:Vangelmesh to Talk:Vanglemesh: canonical spelling

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:30, 2 April 2016
(No difference)

GallifreyanWitch: /* Link to Bangladesh */ new section

2015-02-09T15:20:32Z

Link to Bangladesh: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:20, 9 February 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:

	--[[User:AgProv\|AgProv]] 15:16, 14 November 2010 (CET)		--[[User:AgProv\|AgProv]] 15:16, 14 November 2010 (CET)

			== Link to Bangladesh ==

			Having just added the Annotation about name comparisons to Bangladesh, I decided it best to hold back from adding too many assumptions to the entry.

			What I was thinking of saying though, was from this comparison we might be able to start guessing about the culture and politics of the region. For example, Bangladesh's foreign policy is based on the principle of "friendship towards all and malice towards none". Given Vanglemesh's location - quit close to once invasive Omnia, Istanzia with it's recently transgressing troops (of where we do not know) and various other relatively nearby powers (who, if history teaches us anything, are quite likely to have had little conflicts between each other) a policy like Bangladesh's might prove useful in creating relative benevolent neutrality (if there is such a thing and it's not too paradoxical) and help them avoid any such conflicts.

			--[[User:GallifreyanWitch\|Verity]] ([[User talk:GallifreyanWitch\|talk]]) 15:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Osiris: 1 revision: Talk Namespace

2012-12-26T03:17:16Z

1 revision: Talk Namespace

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:17, 26 December 2012
(No difference)

AgProv at 14:17, 14 November 2010

2010-11-14T14:17:00Z

New page

[[Vanglemesht]] is mentioned twice outside of the Mapp. Could this have been intended to be the same thing? Or is it something else? [[User:TC01|TC01]] 02:33, 14 November 2010 (CET)

That's interesting, as there is a Kahn-Li mentioned in {{RM}} and a country called Khanli on {{DM}}. I have made the assumption these are the same place, (although I always try to be cheeful if I am ever proven wrong!)

Going back to the article on Vanglemesht, though, this specifically says it is about the spoken language, not the country where it is spoken. If the country is Vanglemesh, without a "T", this parellels Roundworld example: eg ''Germany'' (the country) is where ''German'' (the language) is spoken. ''Sverige'' is the name for the country in its own language, which is of course ''svensk.''

Therefore:
*[[Vangelmesh]] the country;
*[[Vanglemesht]] the language

--[[User:AgProv|AgProv]] 15:16, 14 November 2010 (CET)