Talk:Woddeley's Occult Primer - Revision history

Rise Up Against the Ribbon at 12:22, 3 August 2018

2018-08-03T12:22:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:22, 3 August 2018
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Not finding any support or defense, I've removed it. The previous sentence is also speculative but not so tedious. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 04:49, 28 July 2018 (UTC)		Not finding any support or defense, I've removed it. The previous sentence is also speculative but not so tedious. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 04:49, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

			:It's probably better to leave a message on user's talk page (I think it emails new people by default? If not it probably should) when people are new as if you aren't a regular and check back in a month or so it's already disappeared off watch list (the watch list is set by default to only 3 days too!) - I only found these messages by chance as I checked back on the page and noticed it gone

			:It's definitely not a spoiler, it's from the apprentice wizard book that anyone new gets or anyone wandering in to look can read :) I thought it was a nice bit of fluff since it tries to elaborate more on ideas of how Discworld magic would 'work', if you don't want it's up to you admins but I thought it seemed nice since the page was so short and empty! --[[User:Rise Up Against the Ribbon\|Rise Up Against the Ribbon]] ([[User talk:Rise Up Against the Ribbon\|talk]]) 12:22, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Old Dickens: deletion

2018-07-28T04:49:05Z

deletion

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:49, 28 July 2018
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:I've just taken a look at the Discworld MUD and the best I can offer is that this is a spoiler. I suspect it is not sanctioned, as one of the rules is that no spoilers are to be made public. --[[User:Lias Bluestone\|Lias Bluestone]] ([[User talk:Lias Bluestone\|talk]]) 19:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)		:I've just taken a look at the Discworld MUD and the best I can offer is that this is a spoiler. I suspect it is not sanctioned, as one of the rules is that no spoilers are to be made public. --[[User:Lias Bluestone\|Lias Bluestone]] ([[User talk:Lias Bluestone\|talk]]) 19:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

			Not finding any support or defense, I've removed it. The previous sentence is also speculative but not so tedious. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 04:49, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Lias Bluestone at 19:00, 22 July 2018

2018-07-22T19:00:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:00, 22 July 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Hmmm. The recent edit contains no spam and it's too relevant to be called vandalism but it's certainly unsightly and unnecessary. We don't usually reproduce whole publications, even with permission. (L-Space main site, maybe.) I'll wait for some defense or other opinion. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 16:05, 22 July 2018 (UTC)		Hmmm. The recent edit contains no spam and it's too relevant to be called vandalism but it's certainly unsightly and unnecessary. We don't usually reproduce whole publications, even with permission. (L-Space main site, maybe.) I'll wait for some defense or other opinion. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 16:05, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

			:I've just taken a look at the Discworld MUD and the best I can offer is that this is a spoiler. I suspect it is not sanctioned, as one of the rules is that no spoilers are to be made public. --[[User:Lias Bluestone\|Lias Bluestone]] ([[User talk:Lias Bluestone\|talk]]) 19:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Old Dickens: overreach

2018-07-22T16:05:16Z

overreach

New page

Hmmm. The recent edit contains no spam and it's too relevant to be called vandalism but it's certainly unsightly and unnecessary. We don't usually reproduce whole publications, even with permission. (L-Space main site, maybe.) I'll wait for some defense or other opinion. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 16:05, 22 July 2018 (UTC)