User talk:Wonderful Fanny - Revision history

Wonderful Fanny at 08:27, 30 January 2018

2018-01-30T08:27:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:27, 30 January 2018
Line 7:		Line 7:


	Thank you, Old Dickens. I will learn to avoid becoming historical. I do not see how to remove a page, but Ramkin House may be deleted. (I did look for ~~it lunder~~ the Locations page, but didn't see it there.) Anyway, I have added a few points to Ramkin Residence, as you suggested. I ~~will double check~~ on ACCOoDD, ~~but either way, wouldn't Thud hold more authority, being the source mainstream novel?~~		Thank you, Old Dickens. I will learn to avoid becoming historical. I do not see how to remove a page, but Ramkin House may be deleted. (Before adding the page, I did look for Ramkin House under the Locations page listed in the Navigation bar to the left, but didn't see it there. This is not the same page as your footer category link Locations, where it is clearly listed, and which I found much easier to use). Anyway, I have added a few points to Ramkin Residence, as you suggested. I edited the {{SN}} section on ACCOoDD, to clarify.

Wonderful Fanny at 07:57, 30 January 2018

2018-01-30T07:57:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:57, 30 January 2018
Line 7:		Line 7:


	Thank you, Old Dickens. I will learn to avoid becoming historical. I do not see how to remove a page, but Ramkin House may be deleted. (I did look for it lunder the Locations page, but didn't see it there.) Anyway, I have added a few points to Ramkin Residence, as you suggested. I will double check on ACCOoDD, but either way, wouldn't Thud hold more authority, being the source ~~text~~?		Thank you, Old Dickens. I will learn to avoid becoming historical. I do not see how to remove a page, but Ramkin House may be deleted. (I did look for it lunder the Locations page, but didn't see it there.) Anyway, I have added a few points to Ramkin Residence, as you suggested. I will double check on ACCOoDD, but either way, wouldn't Thud hold more authority, being the source mainstream novel?

Wonderful Fanny at 07:27, 30 January 2018

2018-01-30T07:27:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:27, 30 January 2018
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* I did enjoy "virtuosa" for its literary correctness and political incorrectness.<BR>		* I did enjoy "virtuosa" for its literary correctness and political incorrectness.<BR>
	Please add whatever useful points you had to [[Ramkin Residence]], but [[Ramkin House]] will have to be deleted. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 04:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)		Please add whatever useful points you had to [[Ramkin Residence]], but [[Ramkin House]] will have to be deleted. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 04:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)


			Thank you, Old Dickens. I will learn to avoid becoming historical. I do not see how to remove a page, but Ramkin House may be deleted. (I did look for it lunder the Locations page, but didn't see it there.) Anyway, I have added a few points to Ramkin Residence, as you suggested. I will double check on ACCOoDD, but either way, wouldn't Thud hold more authority, being the source text?

Old Dickens: notes

2018-01-30T04:29:17Z

notes

New page

Hi. Welcome and thanks for the interest, but I have to make a couple of points:
* Try not to duplicate. The page [[Ramkin Residence]] existed already and so some of your additions to [[Sybil Ramkin]] are triplicated.
* Use the '''preview''' (or compose in a separate text editor first), rather than filling a whole page in the '''history''' with one edit.
* I had assumed that ACCOoDD preceded {{T!}} although both were 2005. Are you sure of your correction in {{SN}}?
* I did enjoy "virtuosa" for its literary correctness and political incorrectness.<BR>
Please add whatever useful points you had to [[Ramkin Residence]], but [[Ramkin House]] will have to be deleted. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 04:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)