Book:The Missing Chapter: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (1 revision: Book Namespace) |
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) (layout) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The whereabouts of the Missing Chapter, supposed to have been posted to Usenet, are unknown. All that's known is [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.pratchett/tree/browse_frm/thread/7cb381cd9f88b361/ce64b72b5edbf49c?rnum=31 this mysterious text] pointing to it: | The whereabouts of the Missing Chapter, supposed to have been posted to Usenet, are unknown. All that's known is [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.pratchett/tree/browse_frm/thread/7cb381cd9f88b361/ce64b72b5edbf49c?rnum=31 this mysterious text] pointing to it: | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
something wrong with your site's news software...</blockquote> | something wrong with your site's news software...</blockquote> | ||
[[Category:Discworld Series]] | ==Annotation== | ||
**NOTE: this may be Unseen Academicals, quoting the following post in the link: "You mean the section about the football match? Match of the day will never be the same again. :-)"** | |||
**(Others failing to keep up may want to check the [[Talk:Book:The Missing Chapter|discussion page]].) | |||
[[Category:Discworld Series|Missing Chapter,The]] | |||
Latest revision as of 02:23, 25 June 2014
The whereabouts of the Missing Chapter, supposed to have been posted to Usenet, are unknown. All that's known is this mysterious text pointing to it:
You mean, not everybody has seen the draft chapter of the new Discworld
novel-in-progress that Terry posted here last week? It was the most hilarious thing I've ever read -- especially the scene with the Librarian and the Patrician. If you haven't seen it at your site there is really
something wrong with your site's news software...
Annotation
- NOTE: this may be Unseen Academicals, quoting the following post in the link: "You mean the section about the football match? Match of the day will never be the same again. :-)"**
- (Others failing to keep up may want to check the discussion page.)