File talk:Troll woman sleeping.jpg: Difference between revisions

From Discworld & Terry Pratchett Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(um...no)
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Not apparent to me; I'd say highly contrived. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 18:21, 26 December 2012 (PST)
Not apparent to me; I'd say highly contrived. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 18:21, 26 December 2012 (PST)
A good job I didn't post it to an article then... now you come to mention it, I can see signs of photomanipulation.. that face looks too good to be true, in retrospect. Ah well, just because it was billed as a genuine photograph does not mean I should suspend cynical disbelief... still an interesting piece of artwork in its own right, I think....[[User:AgProv|AgProv]] ([[User talk:AgProv|talk]]) 18:50, 26 December 2012 (PST)
:Yes, quite nice as a piece of art; I wonder if it was even intended as a hoax. She's rather slim and sexy for a Troll... --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 18:59, 26 December 2012 (PST)

Latest revision as of 02:59, 27 December 2012

Not apparent to me; I'd say highly contrived. --Old Dickens (talk) 18:21, 26 December 2012 (PST)


A good job I didn't post it to an article then... now you come to mention it, I can see signs of photomanipulation.. that face looks too good to be true, in retrospect. Ah well, just because it was billed as a genuine photograph does not mean I should suspend cynical disbelief... still an interesting piece of artwork in its own right, I think....AgProv (talk) 18:50, 26 December 2012 (PST)

Yes, quite nice as a piece of art; I wonder if it was even intended as a hoax. She's rather slim and sexy for a Troll... --Old Dickens (talk) 18:59, 26 December 2012 (PST)