Talk:Giamo Casanunda: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision: Talk Namespace) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 03:16, 26 December 2012
Nope. I don't think you can avoid being indelicate, there. And I really don't understand the "Velocity" one, even supposing that's .303 Bookworm. --Old Dickens 00:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Me neither. I don't think its from any of the books. At least, I don't remember it. I may be wrong but if it's not from a book should it be here? --Beligaronia 21:15, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Well, it's an annotation, so it doesn't have to be true or even reasonable to me or anyone. It's an opinion or conjecture or a fact; they're all the same. I can't argue with your opinion. I hate annotations. --Old Dickens 00:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
I believe I have spotted him in Good Omens. 99.238.41.80 00:51, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
I don't think we know what the "Pépé Le Pew reference" is any more. It's a bit of a "huh?" moment. --Old Dickens 02:05, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Same here. Is there anything to associate him with the rather rapey skunk other than the womanising factor? --Hapenny 18:07, 17 April 2012 (GMT)
- Not other than, perhaps, but then that's the main factor. Actually the original comment referred to an edit by Agprov that referred to the reference after having deleted it. Long time no see, by the way. Old Dickens 00:23, 18 April 2012 (CEST)
- O hai, surprised you remember me! Should we remove the Pepe portion or restore the old reference? - Hapenny 02:11, 18 April 2012 (GMT)
- Wait, I see what you mean. It's still a little confusing for me, I definitely had a "huh?" moment when I read the current edit. Hapenny 02:16, 18 April 2012 (GMT)