Talk:Cumbling Michael: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Any comments from wiser souls than I? May I add this as a postscript to the entry for Cumbling Michael? | Any comments from wiser souls than I? May I add this as a postscript to the entry for Cumbling Michael? | ||
:As an annotation, of course. I hate them in general, but this would be better than most. Only the ''comeling'' version makes it to the OED. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 20:09, 17 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:09, 17 April 2020
I have wondered about "Cumbling" as Michael's epithet. I have just found an entry for "cumbling" ini the Middle English Compendium of the University of Michigan: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/middle-english-dictionary/dictionary/MED8519 That reference lists <cǒmeling n. Also comling, cum(e)ling, cumbling & (early) kimeling, kemeling.> from <OE *cymeling, with early substitution of the vowel of cǒmen v.> It can be used as <One who is not a native or a citizen: foreigner, intruder, newcomer; stranger, traveler; a homeless person; -- also used attributively; (b) an adopted child, an orphan.>, all of which are plausible meanings for his epithet.
Any comments from wiser souls than I? May I add this as a postscript to the entry for Cumbling Michael?
- As an annotation, of course. I hate them in general, but this would be better than most. Only the comeling version makes it to the OED. --Old Dickens (talk) 20:09, 17 April 2020 (UTC)