Talk:Sacharissa Cripslock: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I've just had a notion as to who she eventually married, and it ain't William. The Truth will be set free in a forthcoming fanfic...--[[User:AgProv|AgProv]] 22:41, 1 February 2011 (CET) | I've just had a notion as to who she eventually married, and it ain't William. The Truth will be set free in a forthcoming fanfic...--[[User:AgProv|AgProv]] 22:41, 1 February 2011 (CET) | ||
:The Author has been altogether too coy, so I suspect it's a puzzle he's set us (and that it ain't William). The solution might be provided in the next book or two, mind you. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] 00:33, 2 February 2011 (CET) | :The Author has been altogether too coy, so I suspect it's a puzzle he's set us (and that it ain't William). The solution might be provided in the next book or two, mind you. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] 00:33, 2 February 2011 (CET) | ||
:"The lack of emphasis upon a romance between William and Sacharissa may reflect on their own reluctance to publicize their private lives..." Or on The Author's enjoyment of jerking us around with little mysteries that he has no intention of solving. Keeps 'em coming back to check, dunnit? --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 01:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:34, 11 February 2015
I've just had a notion as to who she eventually married, and it ain't William. The Truth will be set free in a forthcoming fanfic...--AgProv 22:41, 1 February 2011 (CET)
- The Author has been altogether too coy, so I suspect it's a puzzle he's set us (and that it ain't William). The solution might be provided in the next book or two, mind you. --Old Dickens 00:33, 2 February 2011 (CET)
- "The lack of emphasis upon a romance between William and Sacharissa may reflect on their own reluctance to publicize their private lives..." Or on The Author's enjoyment of jerking us around with little mysteries that he has no intention of solving. Keeps 'em coming back to check, dunnit? --Old Dickens (talk) 01:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)