Talk:Smith-Rhodes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Domestic Science isn't a specialty I would have guessed, either. There's something to be said for fan fiction. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 01:22, 16 June 2013 (GMT) | Domestic Science isn't a specialty I would have guessed, either. There's something to be said for fan fiction. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 01:22, 16 June 2013 (GMT) | ||
The "organic poisons" part fits, though. Scorpions, other arachnids, serpents, and so on...[[User:AgProv|AgProv]] ([[User talk:AgProv|talk]]) 21:15, 11 November 2013 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 21:15, 11 November 2013
for those unwilling to wait for the authorised tale, a strictly non-canonical biography of Johanna Smith-Rhodes may be found on the Terry Pratchett Fanon Wikia:- [1]
I believe the sources of Rhodes scholars are too limited here and their destination not limited enough. Kris Kristofferson and Bill Clinton were Rhodes scholars; Wikipedia and I are fairly sure they only go to Oxford. --Old Dickens 00:51, 29 November 2011 (CET)
Domestic Science isn't a specialty I would have guessed, either. There's something to be said for fan fiction. --Old Dickens (talk) 01:22, 16 June 2013 (GMT)
The "organic poisons" part fits, though. Scorpions, other arachnids, serpents, and so on...AgProv (talk) 21:15, 11 November 2013 (GMT)