Talk:Webcomic and Graphic Novel Suggestions: Difference between revisions

From Discworld & Terry Pratchett Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:




 
Suggest these courses of action  
I don't see the purpose of this page as a own category and I also do not agree that the page in it's current status should be on the "main page".
Therefore I suggest these courses of action  
A. Changed to a sub-category of reading suggestions (as previous users have proposed) and removed from main page
A. Changed to a sub-category of reading suggestions (as previous users have proposed) and removed from main page
B. Content to be merged into the reading suggestions page and removed from main page
B. Content to be merged into the reading suggestions page and removed from main page
Reasons:  
Reasons:  
1. Lack of content, why have an own category when there is a "reading suggestion" category
1. Lack of content, why have an own category when there is a "reading suggestion" category
2. Lack of relevance to Terry Pratchett and the Discworld (And therefore perhaps not the best to have on the main page)
2. Lack of relevance to Terry Pratchett and the Discworld (And therefore perhaps not the best to have on the main page)
3. Misappropriate number of page views (Being 10,849 times accessed this "page" has more views than E.G.: Lecturer in Recent Runes. page), more than it deserves which  
3. Misappropriate number of page views (Being 10,849 times accessed this "page" has more views than E.G.: Lecturer in Recent Runes. page), more than it deserves which  
in my opinion because of it's placement in the main page
in my opinion because of it's placement in the main page --[--[[User:Heimar|Heimar]] ([[User talk:Heimar|talk]]) 07:24:13, 10 January 2017 (GMT)

Revision as of 07:28, 10 January 2017

I'd put it in Reading suggestions with the rest. --Old Dickens (talk) 01:36, 15 November 2013 (GMT)

Integral or as a sub-category? I'll backtrack and reorganise later - bed beckons right now. And i'm still only up to page 240 - want to make the pleasure last and am rationing myself! AgProv (talk) 01:40, 15 November 2013 (GMT)

It seems to be a page, like Reading suggestions, why its own category? --Old Dickens (talk) 01:55, 15 November 2013 (GMT)


Suggest these courses of action A. Changed to a sub-category of reading suggestions (as previous users have proposed) and removed from main page B. Content to be merged into the reading suggestions page and removed from main page Reasons: 1. Lack of content, why have an own category when there is a "reading suggestion" category 2. Lack of relevance to Terry Pratchett and the Discworld (And therefore perhaps not the best to have on the main page) 3. Misappropriate number of page views (Being 10,849 times accessed this "page" has more views than E.G.: Lecturer in Recent Runes. page), more than it deserves which in my opinion because of it's placement in the main page --[--Heimar (talk) 07:24:13, 10 January 2017 (GMT)