Talk:Articles and Speeches: Difference between revisions

From Discworld & Terry Pratchett Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
Line 5: Line 5:
Are these in any particular order? They don't appear to be in the order presented in {{SK}}, but neither are they arranged by publication date, category or type. This is especially confusing given they're in a numbered list. Would anyone object to me giving this page a pretty major overhaul? -- [[User:Guybrush|Guybrush]] ([[User talk:Guybrush|talk]]) 00:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Are these in any particular order? They don't appear to be in the order presented in {{SK}}, but neither are they arranged by publication date, category or type. This is especially confusing given they're in a numbered list. Would anyone object to me giving this page a pretty major overhaul? -- [[User:Guybrush|Guybrush]] ([[User talk:Guybrush|talk]]) 00:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
:Of course not; putting in chronological order at least. maybe separating types.  --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 00:22, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
:Of course not; putting in chronological order at least. maybe separating types.  --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 00:22, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
::Oof...bigger job than I thought. I have made a start with the view that a partially done job is still better than a job not done at all. Will continue later, including putting them in chronological order. I'll keep the reference numbers for now at least. -- [[User:Guybrush|Guybrush]] ([[User talk:Guybrush|talk]]) 02:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:24, 8 March 2023

Once again all credit goes to terrypratchettbooks.org user TheJackal for compiling this info, source. Jagra(talk) 16:54 UTC 03/02/2016

Organisation?

Are these in any particular order? They don't appear to be in the order presented in A Slip of the Keyboard, but neither are they arranged by publication date, category or type. This is especially confusing given they're in a numbered list. Would anyone object to me giving this page a pretty major overhaul? -- Guybrush (talk) 00:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Of course not; putting in chronological order at least. maybe separating types. --Old Dickens (talk) 00:22, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Oof...bigger job than I thought. I have made a start with the view that a partially done job is still better than a job not done at all. Will continue later, including putting them in chronological order. I'll keep the reference numbers for now at least. -- Guybrush (talk) 02:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)